A bombshell study published by The LancetOne The one pulled within 24 hours is finally seeing the light of day. A systematic review of autopsies of COVID-19 deaths published in the peer-reviewed journal Forensic Science International found that 73.9% of deaths were “directly caused or substantially contributed” to the injection.2 Dr. William Marquis, a Canadian oncologist and cancer researcher, wrote in X:three
“This is a triumph of science over censorship!! Amazing perseverance of first author Nicholas Hulscher who didn't give up after the LANCET retracted the paper without any justification within 24 hours after 100K downloads. Big Pharma put pressure on @TheLancet but it didn't stop us.
“Our paper was delayed by a year, and many preventable deaths were caused by censorship and retraction. This paper could be a game changer.”
High probability of 'causal link' between COVID-19 shots and deaths
The researchers, including Dr. Marquis, a cardiologist, internist, and epidemiologist, and Nicholas Hulscher, an epidemiologist at the University of Michigan's School of Public Health, searched all published autopsies and autopsy reports related to COVID-19 vaccines through May 18, 2023.
Their systematic review included 44 articles, including 325 autopsy cases and one autopsy performed on animals. The average age of the people in these reports was 70.4 years. The most common cause of death was cardiovascular disease, followed by hematological or blood problems and respiratory problems. In 21 cases, three or more organ systems were involved.
The average time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days, but most deaths occurred within a week of the last dose. Three doctors, experts in determining the cause of death and studying the disease, looked at each case individually.
They carefully examined all the information about each person who died and concluded that in 73.9% of cases, the COVID-19 shot was the direct cause or played a significant role in the death. The main causes of death were:4
Sudden cardiac death (35%) | Pulmonary embolism (12.5%) |
Myocardial infarction (12%) | Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) (7.9%) |
Myocarditis (7.1%) | Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%) |
Cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%) |
“The consistency of known COVID-19 vaccine-related injury and death mechanisms across the cases in this review, and the autopsy confirmation based on physician judgment, suggest that there is likely a causal relationship between COVID-19 vaccine and death,” the researchers concluded.5
What was the Lancet trying to hide? 'Many vaccine deaths'
The Jimmy Doerr Show video above discusses why The Lancet retracted the concerning study almost immediately.6 The journal said: “This preprint has been removed from The Lancet preprints because the study's conclusions are not supported by its methodology. The Lancet preprints reserve the right to remove any published article if it is determined that it has violated our screening criteria.”7 As noted in The Daily Sceptic on July 6, 2023:8
“Without seeing more details in the preprint from the Lancet staff who removed the paper, it is difficult to know whether the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the methodology actually has any substance. Many of the paper's authors are at the top of their field, so it is hard to imagine that the review methodology was actually so poor that it deserved to have been removed from the initial review, or that it should have been subjected to a full critical appraisal.
Instead of the crude censorship of a paper that fails to follow the official line, it is bitter. Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet admitted that there has been a single death from a COVID mRNA vaccine. Autopsy evidence showing otherwise is not what the US public health agency wants to hear.”
The censored paper has now been peer-reviewed, but the results provide further support to those who have been warning about the risks of the COVID-19 vaccine. “Independent judgments have shown that 73.9% of deaths were attributed to fatal COVID-19 vaccine injury syndrome,” the researchers explained, adding:9
“These results support the known COVID-19 vaccine-induced syndrome and show a significant temporal association between COVID-19 vaccination and death involving multiple organ systems, most notably the cardiovascular and hematological systems.
From an epidemiological perspective, criteria for causality were met, including biological plausibility, temporal association, internal and external validity, consistency, analogy, and reproducibility with each consecutive case report of death after COVID-19 vaccination, combined with population-based studies describing mortality in vaccinated individuals.
Our findings add to concerns about COVID-19 vaccine side effects and their mechanisms.”
When asked why The Lancet retracted the paper so quickly, The Vigilant Fox responded:10
“Another COVID 'conspiracy theory' becomes reality. The bombshell study censored by The Lancet is now peer reviewed. What were they trying to hide? There were a ton of vaccine deaths.”
Why are COVID-19 vaccines so deadly?
Studies have shown that most COVID-19 shots have been linked to death, suggesting they may share a common factor causing the side effects, possibly the spike protein.11
Spike proteins can circulate in the body after infection or injection and cause damage to cells, tissues and organs. “Spike proteins are deadly proteins,” McCullough said.12 When they accumulate, they can cause inflammation and clotting in tissues.13 In fact, some researchers claim that the spike protein in COVID-19 vaccines is designed to cause severe disease.
The S-2P spike protein used in some COVID-19 vaccines binds more strongly to the ACE2 receptor on cells in the heart, lungs, kidneys, and blood vessels than the spike protein from the original SARS-CoV-2 virus, according to a study published in the journal Science by researchers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health.14
“Given the median time from vaccination to death (14.3 days), the temporal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death in most cases is further supported by the finding that the SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine sequence can circulate in the blood for at least 28 days after vaccination,” the featured study notes.15
Moreover, it has been shown that the spike protein itself is sufficient to cause inflammation and damage to the vascular system, independent of the virus.16 Spike proteins are known to have detrimental effects on the heart, and myocarditis and heart attacks associated with COVID-19 vaccines have been well documented in peer-reviewed studies.17 Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) has been reported following COVID-19 vaccination in both adults and children.
The researchers explained, “A possible mechanism by which MIS occurs following vaccination may be through the systemic distribution of mRNA-containing LNPs (lipid nanoparticles) following vaccination, which then leads to systemic spike protein expression and circulation, resulting in systemic inflammation.”18 Given their findings, they suggest that anyone who has received a COVID-19 vaccine should be monitored for at least a year.19
“The implications of our study apply to unexpected deaths without preexisting conditions among COVID-19 vaccinated individuals. In such cases, it can be inferred that the death may have been caused by COVID-19 vaccination.
Based on our results, as many people have received or will receive one or more COVID-19 vaccines in the future, further urgent investigation is needed to better elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms of death, with the aim of risk stratification and avoiding deaths.
Autopsies should be performed on all patients with the disease who have received one or more COVID-19 vaccines. Clinical monitoring of COVID-19 vaccine recipients is recommended for at least 1 year after vaccination to ensure that no serious adverse events occur that could result in death.”
Potential link between COVID-19 shots and Alzheimer's disease
In addition to cardiovascular-related deaths, McCullough and colleagues reported that COVID-19 vaccination-related deaths have also involved hematological, pulmonary embolism, and respiratory causes, and adverse effects related to the gastrointestinal, immune, and neurological systems have also been reported following COVID-19 vaccination.20
A separate study looked at the link between COVID-19 vaccines and the development of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).21 The study involved 558,017 people living in Seoul, South Korea, who were divided into two groups: those who had been vaccinated against COVID-19 and those who had not.
The study found that people who received COVID-19 shots, especially those who received mRNA shots, had an increased risk of developing MCI and Alzheimer’s disease within three months of getting the shot. The mRNA vaccine group had a significantly higher rate of Alzheimer’s disease compared to the unvaccinated group.
The study suggests a potential link between COVID-19 shots, particularly mRNA shots, and increased rates of Alzheimer’s disease and MCI. “This highlights the need for further research to elucidate the relationship between vaccine-induced immune responses and neurodegenerative processes, and advocates continued monitoring and investigation of the long-term neurological effects of the vaccine,” the researchers said.
Rampant censorship diminishes the truth about COVID-19 vaccine risks
In another example of the rampant censorship surrounding COVID-19 side effects, a now-retracted narrative review published in the journal Cureus called for a global halt to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.22 The review found a significant increase in serious adverse events among people who got the injections, with an “unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio.”23
Taking into account absolute risks and the “number needed to vaccinate” (NNV) — a metric used to quantify how many people need to be vaccinated to prevent one additional case of a particular disease — the review found that “there were about 14 times more deaths from modified mRNA injections per life saved.”24
Commenting on the retraction, McCullough, one of the paper's authors, called it “an astonishing act of scientific censorship.”25 In addition to calling for a global pause on mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, the study authors said the vaccine should be immediately removed from the childhood vaccine schedule and booster doses should be halted.
“It is unethical and unconscionable to administer an experimental vaccine to children who are at little risk of dying from COVID-19, but for whom the best prospective data have established a 2.2% risk of permanent cardiac damage,” the paper notes.26
These deferrals were made in light of the risk of serious adverse events, mechanisms of adverse events, mortality data, ineffectiveness, and issues related to vaccine administration and handling.27 Like the featured Lancet study, the Cureus study has already been extremely popular, with 330,000 views/views/downloads in one month, compared to an average of 2,700 total views/views/downloads per year for a Cureus paper.28
With each unsubstantiated retraction, more and more people will begin to question why this important information is not openly discussed or presented to the public, but continues to be censored and withheld from the public.
Have you been injured by a COVID-19 shot? Here’s help
If you have any unusual symptoms after getting a COVID-19 vaccine, seek professional help. The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has a treatment protocol for injuries after vaccination, called I-RECOVER, which can be downloaded from covid19criticalcare.com.29
Dr. Pierre Kory, who co-founded FLCCC, has shifted his practice to treating vaccine-injured patients almost exclusively. For more information, visit DrPierreKory.com. Dr. McCullough is also investigating additional post-injection treatments, which can be found at PeterMcCulloughMD.com. Finally, if you are suffering from chronic vaccine-injured patients, review strategies to improve mitochondrial health to help your body heal.
