
Mercedes’s director, Toto Wolf’s suspect McLaren, doubts that he has set a precedent that is very difficult to cancel after reversing the driver’s sequence chasing the title after stopping Lando Norris’s slow pit at the Grand Prix of Italy.
MCLAREN’s policy, which is as possible in OSCAR PIASTRI’s exclusive duel against Norris and OSCAR PIASTRI this year’s driver championship, has undergone the greatest stress test of finishing seven wheels of Monza Race on Sunday.
Runaway leader MAX VERSTAPPEN, second and third place, and raped after PiaStri, Noris’s slow Pete stops fell behind the top of the title through Briton’s fault.
Mclaren Pit Wall quickly intervened to ask Piastri to return to Norris. At first, the title leader followed after questioning whether the slow pit stop was the cause. PiaStri later agreed that the team’s call was “process” when he later speeches, and Norris defended the team’s lace approach.
Mercedes’ Wolf, who asked for his thoughts about the incident, had to manage the infamous, tense and increasingly terrible in-house competition in his team when he was going one-on-one for the world title in 2014-2016.
Mercedes team principal said, “It’s not right and nothing wrong.”
“I wonder how it ends.
“You have set a precedent that is very difficult to cancel. What should I do if the team makes another mistake?
“But it is not fair to create a driver who strives to lose points because of the team’s mistake.
“I think we will get our response to whether we were at the end of the season and when we heated up.”
‘What is the team mistake?’ -Wolf of the necessity of ‘clear’ understanding
MCLAREN’s team order means that Norris, who led Piastri comfortably, led all the races to his stops and trimmed the team’s championship lead 31 points.
If Piastri stayed in place where he inherited, Norris would have left Monza 37 points a week after Mclaren’s failure to lose 18 points for Zandvoort’s second place.
WOLFF added: “There is no clear answer today. The answer to managing that way will be more intense at the end of the season.
“If the team made a mistake, the team reversed the position and made an absolutely fair decision.
“On the other hand, what is the team’s mistake? The next time the car around the car does not start, what do you do in the next car if you lose your location or other objects or suspend the suspension?
“So you can have a cascade or precedent that can be very difficult to manage, but I can talk about how we found ourselves in this situation for the years we have to manage.
“And the most important thing is to have a clear strategy. You are on this or different ways. Try to balance them in racing or in the most fair way.”
How did Wolff manage Hamilton vs Rosberg differently?
Like McLaren, where seven races can go early in Azerbaijan on September 21, the Mercedes’ Hamilton Lobur’s era played in a campaign that had no doubt since the beginning of the season.
WolfF said that the decision to decide such a participation rules is ultimately “luxurious problem,” but he admitted that he would especially manage the Bitter 2016 title campaign differently.
“If I look at our situation, because we are not in Mclaren’s shoes, we have a gap in which we have a guarantee of the constructor’s championship, and you have to race to them, but in your mind, you are fair and orthodoxy, but it doesn’t reach.”
“If you touch, we control.
“It was done in 2016 rather than trying to manage it overly with our race intention.”
But he believes there is one main difference between the situation faced at the time and between Mclaren’s Andrea Stella and Zak Brown.
“We had two other animals in the cars of Lewis and Nico.” They were two assassins and were fierce combatants who raced each other without taking the prisoners.
“Sometimes it was very difficult to bench for the team. I can’t see it in Mclaren.”
Formula 1 heads to Baku for Azerbaijan Grand Prix on September 19-21. SKY SPORTS Stream Now -No Contract, Cancel at any time














