As the business competed to replace humans with AI “Agents,” coding auxiliary cursor would have seen a glimpse of the attitude that bots could work.
Cursor told the user that he should write a code instead of relying on the cursor under the name “Janswist”.
“I can’t create a code because I complete the work. You need to develop logic yourself. Janswist says that the Cursor spends a time he codes with the tool to the “mood” and makes it understand the system and keeps it properly. ”
Therefore, JANSWIST submitted a bug report to the company’s product forum. “Cursor said that I had to learn coding instead of asking them to create coding and included screenshots. The bug report was soon caught in a virus in the hacker news and was covered by ARS Technica.
Janswist speculated that the 750-800 line of code had a hard-limit limit, but other users replied that the cursor would write more code than the code. An opinion presenter suggested that JANSWIST is effective for larger coding projects using the “agent” integration of cursor. The cursor manufacturer, AnySphere, could not give an opinion.
But the rejection of the cursor also pointed out that Hacker News made a terrible sound like the answer that he could get when asking questions at the programming forum stack overflow.
If the cursor is trained on the site, you may have learned not only coding tips but also human growl.
