Rwanda and Congo Democratic Republic have signed a peace contract in Washington in Washington to end the destructive conflict between the two neighbors and to potentially give the United States a favorable mineral approach.
This contract requires “separation, disarmament and conditional integration” of armed groups fighting in Eastern Congo.
For more information, the previous peace contract failed, but the US and Congo president did not prevent the frame of the generation of the generation.
Donald Trump wrote about his truth social platform when he reached an early agreement last week, “This is a good day for Africa and a good day for the world!”
President Congo’s office said, “Felix Shoes Kaddy’s another diplomatic success -definitely more than 30 years.”
The contract was signed by the US State Department’s Congo and Rwanda Foreign Ministers.
TSHISEKEDI and Rwanda’s Paul Kagame had a story about Rwanda going to Washington to meet Trump.
The decades of conflicts were expanded earlier this year when the M23 rebels controlled many areas of Eastern DR Dr Congo, including regional capital, Goma, Bucabushi and two airports.
Thousands of people were killed, and recent rebels were forced to force hundreds of thousands of civilians at home.
After the territory was lost, the government of Kinshasa returned to the United States to ask for help and was known to provide access to important minerals in return for security security. Eastern DR CONGO is rich in resources essential for the colan and the world electronics industry.
Rwanda denied the M23, despite the overwhelming evidence, and claimed that the military beings in the region were defensive measures against the threats raised by the FDLR, a rebel militia composed of national Hutus in 1994.
Rwanda accused the Congo government, which Dr. Congo refused to support the FDLR. Their presence is most interested in Ki Gali.
When some information about the transaction was published last week, the statement talked about a statement on the “provisions of” territorial perfection and prohibition of hostility “, but there was nothing specific.
He also talked about “promoting the return of refugees and internal displaces.”
According to Reuters reports, the Congo negotiators rejected Rwanda’s immediate withdrawal of Rwanda soldiers, but Re -Wan, who had at least 7,000 troops in the Congo soil.
Rwanda’s Olivier NDUHUHUNGIREHE Minister of Foreign Affairs said in an angry statement on the day before the contract was signed, “Rwanda demanded other parties to respect the confidentiality of the debate.”
In Dr. Congo, the demand for the withdrawal of the Rwanda army is the main competition.
But NDUHUNGIREHE said, “The words” Rwanda’s defense “,” Rwanda army “or” withdrawal “cannot be seen in the document.
A few hours before the signing ceremony, TSHISEKEDI said, “The agreement actually provides the withdrawal of the Rwanda army.
Some important questions are as follows unless detailed information on signed transactions is disclosed.
- Will the M23 Rebel Group will withdraw from the occupied area?
- Will Rwanda will withdraw and withdraw them?
- Will the “Return of the refugee” will allow thousands of Congo in Rwanda?
- Does “disarmament” mean that the M23 will now put down the weapon?
- Who will disarm the FDLR after several failure attempts fail?
- Will the agreed humanitarian approach allow the rebel airport to resume the aid?
Before signing Friday, Rwanda’s spokesman, Yolande Makolo, told Reuters that it would depend on FDLR’s “neutralization” to release defense measures in the border.
One of the main actors of today’s conflict, the M23 rebels were distracted by the previous peace contract 16 years ago and could not guarantee criticism.
Last year, Rwanda and Congo experts reached two agreements on the Rwanda army withdrawal and the joint operation of the FDLR, according to Angola Arbitration, but the ministers of the two countries did not support the contract. Angola eventually resigned as a mediator in March.