Antonee Robinson was hit by the Premier League’s referee standards after PGMOL recognized the VAR error in Chelsea vs Fulham.
The first half strike of Josh King was excluded after instructing Rob Jones to review the contacts between Rodrigo Muniz and Trevoh Chalobah by Michael Salisbury. The decision was made by Marco Silva “incredibly” labeled, while Mike Dean described the call as “poor” and caused a great debate.
Robinson wrote in his Instagram story and wrote: “What is the point if they can check something for 5 minutes and still get wrong?
“Temporary standards have been shocked by Priping for too long.”
Fulham lost 2-0, and Robinson came from the bench at Stamford Bridge.
PGMOL and Premier League refused to comment when they approached. Sky Sports News.
Solzbury stood after the error
Salisbury, a VAR of Stamford Bridge, was given from the participation in the Sunday Premier League match between Liverpool and Arsenal after the incident.
Sky Sports News The decision of the Fulham game did not match the principle of ‘referee’s phone’ and did not meet the high rods needed for intervention. This only corresponds to a clear and obvious error.
Howard Webb contacted Fulham on Saturday and decided to replace Salisbury with John Brooks in Sunday match.
Fulham refused to comment after they approached. Sky Sports News.
Use a Chrome browser for more accessible video players.
Mike Dean and Soccer Saturday Studios were stunned by the fulham’s goal for Chelsea by Paulo Var committed by Rodrigo Muniz.
‘Poor and poor calls’ -How did administrators and experts react?
Fulham’s manager, Marco Silva, said in a press conference that “an incredible decision, an incredible decision.” “I was not the most likely (talking about it), but it was hard to believe how the goal was not allowed.”
When SILVA asked if he had talked to the referee for a full time the decision he decided not to allow the goal, “No, I did not talk with him, I talked with Half Time to understand why the goal was not allowed.
“I want to explain a lot of things. The first goal -more than 8 minutes. It’s already 9 minutes after the first corner. Now it’s time to stop the game. That’s the rules.
“I asked the referee, and he said because we had lost time, but I confirmed eight minutes. The game did not stop.
“It’s very difficult. I make a mistake. The referee makes a mistake, but when it’s black or white, we can’t see what is not there.”
Use a Chrome browser for more accessible video players.
Kaveh Solhekol explains why VAR civil servants Michael Salisbury made an error in Fulham in Chelsea, and then given from the VAR duty of Liverpool vs. Arsenal games.
speaking Saturday footballFormer Premier League referee Mike Dean questioned VAR’s intervention.
“I don’t think it’s a foul. You must be able to withstand it. I don’t know anywhere where the attacker can step on it.
“ROB was sucked by Var (Michael Salisbury), he just landed on his feet, only one place, a poor and poor call.
“VAR should only avoid it, it’s not a clear and obvious error, but he was not concerned about sticking to the field decision.
But Chelsea Boss Enzo Maresca MUNIZ said that it is “clear” that MUNIZ fulfills Charlova as he stacked the unlocked goal of King.
Use a Chrome browser for more accessible video players.
Free viewing: Highlights of Chelsea match against Fulham in the Premier League
Maresca said at the press conference after the game and said: “I review both actions, in my point of view, their players are kicked and the second is handball.
“It’s obvious that it’s foul. I’m generally very happy. Today I was not happy after the first half. We didn’t play in the ball and it wasn’t good enough in duel.”
