
International editor
Israel began the war after the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, armed with weapons listed by payments, supply and the United States.
Other allies gave Israel a powerful thing in their own way. Most of the 1,200 people, mostly in good faith and solidarity based on the rebellion against the murder of Israelic civilians, and 251 people were dragged from Gaza to hostage.
Now, as long as France, the United Kingdom and Canada are concerned, the credit of Israel seems to have disappeared. They were most powerful for Israel’s way of fighting war in Gaza.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he would destroy Hamas, rescue the rest of the hostages, and put all Gaza directly under Israeli military control.
Their statement dismisses the claim after Netana and requires a ceasefire. The three governments added, “We strongly oppose Israel’s military operations in Gaza.”
They demanded the release of the hostage and believed that the Israeli state had the right to defend the Israelites against terrorism after the “severe attack” on October 7, but this escalation is entirely unbalanced. “
Netana Hu said that he decided to allow “minimal” food to go to the food.
Netanyahu said, “London, Otto and Paris leaders invited more cruelty on October 7, winning a great award for massacre attacks against Israel.”
He argued that if Hamas returned his hostages, put down weapons, agreed to enter asylum, and became demolarized, the war could end. “I can’t expect any countries to accept less, and Israel will not be sure,” he said.
Netanyahu was under international pressure to end the blockade of the Gaza in accordance with the respected international investigation against the imminent famine of the international investigation, which was dismissed as “anti -Semitism” under the warrant of the International Criminal Court for International War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity.
At the London summit between the European Union and the United Kingdom, António Costa called Gaza’s humanitarian crisis as “a tragedy that systematically violates international law and receives uneven military power.”
“There must be a safe, quick and unbreakable approach for humanitarian aid,” he said.
The decision after Netana, who wants to allow a limited supplier, was blamed by his Ultra Nationalist Coalition Partners.
In 2007, in 2007, the Security Minister, who supported racism and supported the extremist Jewish groups that Israel was classified as terrorist organizations, complained that the decision of Netana would argue with Hamas and grant oxygen while our hostages suffered from tunnels.
As Israeli troops developed and air and artillery strikes, only five trucks were made on Monday, as Palestinian civilians, including many children, died.
Opposition to the destruction of Israel and tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians will say that the French, British and Canadian governments are speaking too late.
Many of them have several months of protests protesting the death and destruction of the Gaza, and they are attacked by the murder of Palestinian civilians, the land of the Westbank, the other side of the Palestinian territory, military operations and armed Jewish settlers.
But sometimes in the politics of war, a single case has a symbolic power to rapidly and determine the government to force the government to act. This time, on March 23, he was killed by the Israeli troops from 15 paramedics and original workers.
On March 18, Israel came after breaking the truce for two months with a series of massive air strikes.
For five days in the new war, the Israeli unit attacked medical transport and covered the people and bullets they killed. Israel’s explanation for what happened when he recovered his cell phone from the body of a lump tomb was not true.
The owner filmed the case before he was killed. Contrary to Israel’s claim that emergency workers are a potential threat to Israeli battle soldiers, the tomb’s video has been clearly marked and a bright ambulance and emergency vehicle have been systematically attacked until almost everyone was killed.
Alarms have been growing rapidly since then, as well as the general opponents of Israel. The European alliance, led by the French President Macron, has strengthened their language. The statement requiring the end of Israel’s offensive is the most severe criticism of Israel.
The European diplomatic sources related to their discussions said that the rough language reflects the feeling of true political anger that is humanitarian, intersecting, and the Israeli government.
To Israel, the statement says, “We will not wait while the Netanyahu government pursues these tremendous actions. If Israel does not stop new military attacks and does not raise restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take more specific stages.”
They do not specify what it is. Sanctions can be a possibility. The bigger stage is to recognize Palestine as an independent country.
France joins one 148 different states at the meeting and has a co -chairman with Saudi Arabia in New York in early June. The United Kingdom also talked about Palestinian perception with France.
Israel said he would go back hard and win Hamas. But the tone of the statements of the French, Canadians and the British suggests that Israel is losing pressure.