Home Sports Jannik Sinter: The Lawyer of World NO 1 is in line with...

Jannik Sinter: The Lawyer of World NO 1 is in line with the criticism of ‘unfair’ for the ban for three months in the doping case | Tennis News

Jannik Sinter: The Lawyer of World NO 1 is in line with the criticism of ‘unfair’ for the ban for three months in the doping case | Tennis News

Jannik Singer’s lawyer counterattacked the “unfair” criticism against Tennis NO 1.

The Italian lawyers argued that it was not the case of cheating, but the pollution of massage was in charge of two positive tests on the forbidden protein fairy tale steroids last year.

SINNER has won two Grand Slams in the US Open and Australian Open since positive tests. 24 Grand Slam Champions Novak Djokovic argued that the majority of players did not think that the punishment was fair.

Use a Chrome browser for more accessible video players.

JACK Draper expects Jannik Singer to be fine after Italy was banned for three months after two positive drug inspections in 2024.

But the lawyer’s lawyer, Jamie Singer, I told Sky News: “I always think that the player is always a hok when it is another player.

“It’s very unfair, he has been in the process from the beginning of the book, and there’s no favor, and that’s a very unusual thing, he thinks he’s treated very harshly.

“Players have quite a platform, but it’s not necessarily a chance to investigate and get all the details there.

Use a Chrome browser for more accessible video players.

TIM Henman says that it is for three months for three months of Tannik Sinter for three months, leaving ‘sour flavor’ in sports.

SINNER, which overturned the provisional -initial secret -stop in April, was delayed by the international tennis cleansing institution.

They accepted the sinner’s mitigation that Closteball, a substance derived from testosterone, entered the system through a spray used by a physical therapist.

But higher institutions, the world’s anti -doping institution, believe that sinners should face sanctions. Then, as the hearing approached in the Sports Arbitration Court, SINNER’s court team cut the transaction to avoid at least one year of ban he faced.

Use a Chrome browser for more accessible video players.

Novak Djokovic says that the majority of the players who said that the generous bany nick sinner who had a positive drug test was unfair and favored the sports.

Singer said in an exclusive interview, “I see that he has an independent court that the independent court has not been applied.”

“And why do he accept him in three months?

“He thinks he’s been treated very harshly, but he accepts that everyone is eligible to get his opinion.”

video:
Jannik Singer was banned for three months by Wada.

Is the three -month sanctions a fair ban?

In a separate discovery, the world’s best anti -doping lawyer said SINNER’s past exams were reviewed in SKY News.

WADA legal adviser Ross Wenzel said: “Wada looked at one of SINNER’s samples for two positive two positive 12 months in March last year, but in this sample, suspiciously suspicious of this material in this sample. mark.

“And all the laboratory answers were a lot of samples. So I think about everything that people say and think about this case. I think it’s not doping or cheating.”

There was a claim that SINNER did not fall lightly, and there was no convenient resolution to return to the French opening in May.

Wenzel said in an interview: “In this case, three months of sanctions were the right and fair result, given the very unique facts.

“At any stage of the process, the ability to agree with the aging agreement is clearly stated in the rules.

“I think this provision has been in effect since it has been fermented four years ago. And in this case, we thought it was the right result in this case.”

Use a Chrome browser for more accessible video players.

Nick Kyrgios has been treated as ‘terrible’ last month, criticizing the doping incidents related to Jannik Singer and Iga Swipe, and says ‘treatment should be fair for everyone’.

After seeing the bandage, SINNER found a warranty in his physics that the substance prohibited to treat the cut was not used. Spray was applied only after the evil loan was removed, and the sinner was tested.

Wenzel said: “If you want, it was a paradigm case that agrees with the resolution because the minimum sanctions (one -year ban) are unfair in our view.

Stream the ATP and WTA Tour and US Open, Live or NOW and SKY SPORTS apps on the 2025 SKY SPORTS.

Daniel Dubois vs Joseph Parker and The Artur Beterbiev vs Dmitry Bivol Rejatch will be broadcast live on Saturday, February 22. Sky Sports Box Office. Book now!

Exit mobile version