Trump’s Iran dilemma exposes the bitter division in the president’s circle.

Bern Debusmann JR & MAX MATZA

BBC News

grey placeholderGetty Image Trump returned from Canada's G7 meeting, wearing a blue tie, stabbing his head and talking to a reporter through the door of Air Force 1.Getty image

The dilemma, whether the United States should join Israel when attacking Iran, exposed divisions among the supporters of US President Donald Trump.

Republican President said on Wednesday that “I can do so,” he said.

Trump often opposed the “stupid endless war” in the Middle East in the campaign trail, but Iran insisted that “I can’t have nuclear weapons.”

The possibility of leading the United States to another foreign entanglement opposed his party’s isolation and stupid wings.

Among the people who expressed doubt about Iran’s nuclear plan, Trump’s national intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard testified that the rich uranium of Aran was the highest in Congress, but experts did not believe it was working on nuclear weapons.

June 10 -Three days before the strike on Iran, Gabbard also posted a video that “political elite and warm people” warns of “careless” fear and tension “at the danger of a nuclear outlook.

Gabbard’s video and pre -opinion opened a crack between her and Trump.

City Hall: Do you protect the world or avoid war? Americans were divided into Iranian disputes

Trump told reporters when he asked about her early opinion before Congress. “I think they have weapons.”

She later told the media that the media was out of context and to CNN that he was on the same page with Trump.

Gabbard was not alone in criticizing the US’s potential involvement in disputes.

On Tuesday, Kentucky’s conservative Republican Congressman Thomas Massie introduced a bill with the Democratic Party to prevent Trump from participating in the US military with Iran without parliamentary approval.

“This is not our war. Even so, Congress must decide such a problem according to the Constitution.” Massie posted on X.

Trump’s first supporters of the “America” ​​doctrine pointed out that they would stop the United States in the same “eternal war”, like thousands of US troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson called for the United States to get out of conflict with Iran.

In his podcasts, he blamed the Republican “Warmongers”, causing Trump’s rebuke, who called Carlson as “Cookie.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene, a member of the Georgia Parliament and Trump’s loyalty, entered Carlson’s defense with a very unusual break with the president.

She said that the person who was involved was not “American first.”

On Tuesday, Texas Senator Ted Cruz, Texas, was tension on Tuesday. Cruise became defensive when he asked if he knew Iran’s population and national mix.

Carlson said, “You are a senator who demands the overturn of the government and knows nothing about the country!”

CRUZ said: “No, you don’t know anything about the country!”

Trump’s former political strategist Steve Bannon argued in Carlson’s podcast that “deep countries” could lead the United States to Iran and war.

“If we fall into this war, we will not only blow up the union if it is unlikely to happen in terms of combat, but it will prevent the most important thing. This is the deportation of illegal alien invaders here.”

But on Wednesday, Bannon seemed to make his tone a bit soft, and told the attendees of the Christian Science Monitor event that his supporters’ MAGA Wing decided to commit our army in conflict.

“Maybe we hate it, but as you know, we will board.” He said.

Another conservative political argument, Charlie Kirk, describes himself closer to the “isolated” of the debate, and Trump is “practical” and “common sense” in X.

Kirk said, “I don’t know if Trump will choose to participate in the United States for Iran.” “But he is a person who believes that I will make that decision.”

What do we know about Fordo Nucle Site?

Senator Mitch McConnell, Senator Kentucky, said in the party that “it became a bad state for isolated.”

McConel told CNN, “The thing that happens here is the containment movement led by Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon.

The other Warhawks of the party is achieving Trump with the goal of Iran.

Senator Lindsey Graham, Senator of South Carolina, said that Iran is in the US’s national security interests to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear bomb. Tehran argues that the nuclear program is for peaceful and civilian purposes such as energy.

“Trump understands the threat of Ayatola (Iran’s chief leader Alikame Ney), as well as Israel, and will help Israel to work at the end of the day,” GRAHAM told Fox News.

In a social media post that wants to resolve divisions, Trump said, “You can decide to take further measures to end the strengthening of Iran.”

“The decision ultimately belongs to the president,” he added. “Of course, people have the right to worry about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of foolish foreign policy.”

According to a recent poll, Trump voters will support the United States extensively to help Israel attack Iran.

According to a survey by Gray House, 79 percent of respondents will support the United States, which offers an aggressive weapon that can attack Iran’s military goals. About 89%of Gaita was concerned about getting atomic bombs.

But on Trump’s truth social media platform, many expressed their concern that the United States could be stimulated again in thousands of miles of Middle East disputes.

One user wrote, “There is no war with Iran. There is no foreign war anymore.” “American first!”

Other users warned that the US participation in Israel’s operation could take the cost of Republicans politically in the next few years.

“Do not do this.” User wrote. “Republicans will never win again.”

Trump is campaigning for the White House in September, “We will quickly restore the stability of the Middle East, and we will return the world to peace.”

As a dispute over the Iran-Israeli conflict, the question of whether the US president is isolated or arbitrator can answer sooner later.